[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Last contents of other sections
..
:: ::
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
Bias correction of numerical precipitation forecasting model outputs from the TIGGE database
Soudabeh Behiyan Motlagh * , Afshin Honarbakhsh
Department of Natural Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord
Abstract:   (171 Views)
Accurate precipitation forecasting is essential for flood forecasting and water resources management. In recent years, numerical weather prediction (NWP) models have been extensively developed and are widely used by major meteorological centers for operational weather forecasting. The TIGGE database integrates forecasts from these models, providing a valuable resource for evaluating precipitation prediction performance. This study investigated the effectiveness of seven bias-correction methods applied to precipitation forecasts generated by ten NWP models available in the TIGGE database for the Poldokhtar watershed. The results showed that most forecasting models exhibited the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) at low elevations and the highest RMSE at high elevations. Among the ten models evaluated, the ECMWF model achieved the lowest RMSE (approximately 5 mm day⁻¹), whereas the NCMRWF model produced the highest RMSE (approximately 8.8 mm day⁻¹). Evaluation of the bias-corrected precipitation forecasts indicated that the EZ, STB, and QM methods outperformed the other correction methods at several stations across the study area. In contrast, the Delta method consistently improved forecast performance across all evaluated models, regardless of geographical location. The LS and EQM methods showed little to no improvement in precipitation forecasts, while the TVSV method produced corrected precipitation values that differed considerably from the observed precipitation. Overall, the results demonstrate that post-processing of precipitation forecasts can substantially improve the performance of numerical weather prediction models, thereby enhancing their applicability for flood forecasting and early warning systems.
Article number: 1
Keywords: Error correction, Numerical weather prediction model, Post-processing, Delta bias correction factor, QM bias correction factor
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/04/23 | Revised: 2026/08/17 | Accepted: 2026/06/27 | ePublished ahead of print: 2026/07/31 | ePublished: 2026/07/31
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی سامانه های سطوح آبگیر باران Iranian Journal of Rainwater Catchment Systems
تکمیل و ارسال فرم تعارض منافع
نویسنده گرامی ، پس از ارسال مقاله ، جهت دریافت فرم، لطفا بر روی کلمه فرم تعارض منافع کلیک نمایید و پس از تکمیل، در فایل های پیوست مقاله قرار دهید.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.18 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4772