[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Last contents of other sections
..
:: ::
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
Evaluation of GPM-IMERG precipitation estimate errors using empirical quantile mapping for runoff management in the Caspian Coastal Region
Bromand Salahi * , Ali Shahi
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
Abstract:   (508 Views)
This study aimed to evaluate and bias-correct GPM-IMERG satellite precipitation estimates using the Empirical Quantile Mapping (EQM) method in the Caspian Sea coastal region of Iran over the 2005–2014 period. To this end, daily precipitation data from five synoptic stations—Bandar Anzali, Rasht, Ramsar, Babolsar, and Gorgan—representing the diverse climatic characteristics, were used. Ground-based observations were obtained from the Iran Meteorological Organization (IRIMO), while GPM-IMERG satellite data were retrieved via the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. The performance of the satellite estimates and the effectiveness of the bias correction were evaluated at daily, monthly, and annual timescales using several statistical metrics, including the Pearson correlation coefficient, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Percent Bias (PBIAS), Probability of Detection (POD), and False Alarm Ratio (FAR). Additionally, Taylor diagrams were employed to simultaneously assess correlation, standard deviation, and root-mean-square error, analyzing satellite performance before and after bias correction. The results indicated that applying the EQM method improved GPM-IMERG performance at most stations across both daily and monthly timescales. At the daily scale, RMSE decreased by 5.7% to 20.4% across all stations. Furthermore, the absolute percent bias (PBIAS) converged toward zero, showing reductions ranging from 47.1% to 98.9%. The NSE values also improved across all stations, though they remained negative in most cases at the daily level. On the monthly scale, the impact of the bias correction was more pronounced; RMSE decreased by 6.2% to 27.9% in four out of five stations, although it increased by 4.6% in Bandar Anzali. Additionally, PBIAS decreased across all stations, with reductions ranging from 56.5% to 98.6%. Moreover, monthly NSE exhibited notable improvements, rising from 0.43 to 0.70 in Gorgan, 0.29 to 0.41 in Rasht, and -0.29 to 0.13 in Ramsar.
Article number: 7
Keywords: Bias Correction, Northern Iran, Remote Sensing, Satellite Data, Statistical Evaluation.
     
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/06/8 | Revised: 2026/09/11 | Accepted: 2026/07/30 | ePublished ahead of print: 2026/07/31 | ePublished: 2026/07/31
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی سامانه های سطوح آبگیر باران Iranian Journal of Rainwater Catchment Systems
تکمیل و ارسال فرم تعارض منافع
نویسنده گرامی ، پس از ارسال مقاله ، جهت دریافت فرم، لطفا بر روی کلمه فرم تعارض منافع کلیک نمایید و پس از تکمیل، در فایل های پیوست مقاله قرار دهید.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4774