[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Last contents of other sections
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 1 (5-2023) ::
2023, 11(1): 53-70 Back to browse issues page
Prioritizing the Construction of Watershed Check dams using spatial multi-criteria evaluation model (Case study: Dorahan watershed)
Amirali Aali * , Saeid Soltani , Hosein Bashari , Afshin Honarbakhsh
Former M.Sc. Student, Watershed Management Engineering Department, Faculty of Natural Resources, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran, Email: Amirali.aali65@gmail.com
Abstract:   (717 Views)
Identifying the appropriate places for implementing various management actions in the watershed is a challenging issue. Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) is an approach to assist managers in solving this problem. This study aimed to determine appropriate places for gabion check dams, earth embankments, and stone and mortar dams using the MCA technique in the Dorahan watershed in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. First, a criteria tree was developed to integrate some ecological maps (flooding, erosion, channel number, slope, and geomorphology) with economic variables (distance to villages and roads) and spatial restriction variables (stream order, slope, geomorphology, and elevation). Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) was used to compare and weight the variables and management options. The eigenvalue vectors were measured for all criteria used in AHP. According to the AHP, the eigenvalues of flooding and erosion as the most important variables were 0.36 and 0.32, respectively. The management options against all criteria were then compared and earth embankment with an eigenvalue of 0.494 was recognized as the best management option in the watershed. Stone and mortar dams and gabion check dams were the two later management options with eigenvectors of 0.316 and 0.126, respectively.  All criteria maps were produced in a raster format by ILWIS software and were then imported into the Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation (SMCE) model. The appropriate areas for the construction of these management options (different kinds of small dams) were then mapped in the watershed. Sub-watersheds 6 and 7 were identified as the most suitable area for implementing these management options. A similar approach can be used to identify the best management practices for suggesting other bio-mechanical projects.
Article number: 4
Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process, small dams, spatial multi-criteria evaluation model, optimize positioning, weighing
Full-Text [PDF 2056 kb]   (265 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Aali A, Soltani S, Bashari H, Honarbakhsh A. Prioritizing the Construction of Watershed Check dams using spatial multi-criteria evaluation model (Case study: Dorahan watershed). Journal of Rainwater Catchment Systems 2023; 11 (1) : 4
URL: http://jircsa.ir/article-1-491-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 1 (5-2023) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی سامانه های سطوح آبگیر باران Iranian Journal of Rainwater Catchment Systems
تکمیل و ارسال فرم تعارض منافع
نویسنده گرامی ، پس از ارسال مقاله ، جهت دریافت فرم، لطفا بر روی کلمه فرم تعارض منافع کلیک نمایید و پس از تکمیل، در فایل های پیوست مقاله قرار دهید.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645